VRP vs. EVPF
VRP (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. VRP is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.
Performance
VRP vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VRP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.23%
EVPF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRP vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 0.97% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRP and EVPF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRP vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank
VRP
EVPF
VRP vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRP | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRP | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.13 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
VRP vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and EVPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRP | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.04% | -2.36% | -43.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.17% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -0.52% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility
VRP vs. EVPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRP | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 4.31% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 4.31% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 4.31% | +10.22% |
VRP vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRP vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison
VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 6.30% | 6.53% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 5.10% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRP and EVPF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.
VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.39% for EVPF.
Find the right allocation for VRP and EVPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer