PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRNIX vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRNIX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRNIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VRNIX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.02%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.


VRNIX

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.13%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
15.02%
ALL TIME*
14.57%

SMH

1D
0.91%
1M
-7.91%
6M
33.70%
YTD
51.46%
1Y
92.69%
3Y*
53.04%
5Y*
32.99%
10Y*
33.99%
ALL TIME*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.29B$7.23B$7.12B
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VRNIX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.91%16.94%24.44%26.49%-19.19%28.64%20.90%31.36%-4.84%21.58%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
51.46%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNIX and SMH is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.77

The correlation between VRNIX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRNIX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRNIX
VRNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VRNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VRNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRNIX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRNIXSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.79

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

15.18

-5.96

VRNIX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRNIX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRNIX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRNIX and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRNIXSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-84.96%

+50.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-24.62%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-35.74%

+16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-45.30%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

-45.30%

+10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-18.46%

+17.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-40.89%

+37.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

6.13%

-4.07%

Volatility

VRNIX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) is 3.47%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that VRNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRNIXSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

14.15%

-10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

32.94%

-22.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

38.50%

-25.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

36.51%

-19.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

33.33%

-15.06%

VRNIX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRNIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRNIX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

VRNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.03%0.82%1.21%1.41%1.59%2.86%1.46%1.65%2.00%1.73%1.93%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRNIX and SMH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to VRNIX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRNIX dropped -34.57% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRNIX and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer