PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRNA vs. CCO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VRNA is traded in USD, while CCO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


VRNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCO.TO

1D
1.98%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
9.98%
6M
10.38%
1Y
51.89%
3Y*
47.76%
5Y*
36.56%
10Y*
25.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%130.21%133.60%-23.92%288.84%-4.00%21.74%-40.41%-18.71%-12.07%
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
9.98%78.52%19.50%91.06%5.05%62.26%52.26%-21.75%23.60%-13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNA and CCO.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.12

The correlation between VRNA and CCO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRNA:

$9.72B

CCO.TO:

CA$61.44B

EPS

VRNA:

-$0.69

CCO.TO:

CA$1.49

PS Ratio

VRNA:

57.97

CCO.TO:

17.36

PB Ratio

VRNA:

34.92

CCO.TO:

8.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRNA:

$167.65M

CCO.TO:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRNA:

$159.52M

CCO.TO:

CA$1.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRNA:

-$40.86M

CCO.TO:

CA$818.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRNA vs. CCO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRNA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CCO.TO
CCO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRNACCO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRNACCO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.83%

Volatility

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRNACCO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.66%

Dividends

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison

VRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.19%0.22%0.21%0.39%0.29%0.47%0.69%0.52%3.45%2.85%2.34%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verona Pharma plc and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
75.14M
845.37M
(VRNA) Total Revenue
(CCO.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VRNA values in USD, CCO.TO values in CAD

VRNA vs. CCO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verona Pharma plc and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.4%
34.3%
Portfolio components
VRNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a gross profit of 71.68M and revenue of 75.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.4%.

CCO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.25M and revenue of 845.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

VRNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported an operating income of 9.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

CCO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 153.89M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

VRNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a net income of 8.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

CCO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 130.75M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRNA and CCO.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRNA and CCO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer