VRM vs. EDU
VRM (Vroom, Inc.) and EDU (New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.) are both stocks. VRM operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while EDU operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, VRM returned -70.56%/yr vs -5.33%/yr for EDU. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRM vs. EDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRM achieves a -63.13% return, which is significantly lower than EDU's -10.74% return.
VRM
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- -60.23%
- YTD
- -63.13%
- 1Y
- -74.72%
- 3Y*
- -65.18%
- 5Y*
- -70.56%
- 10Y*
- —
EDU
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- 6M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 1Y
- -5.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -5.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
VRM vs. EDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRM Vroom, Inc. | -63.13% | 296.81% | -89.61% | -40.93% | -90.55% | -73.66% | 1.79% |
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | -10.74% | -13.27% | -11.55% | 110.45% | 65.81% | -88.70% | 40.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRM and EDU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2020 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
VRM:
$38.17M
EDU:
$7.73B
VRM:
-$13.51
EDU:
$2.63
VRM:
0.50
EDU:
1.44
VRM:
$50.29M
EDU:
$5.39B
VRM:
$24.05M
EDU:
$2.96B
VRM:
-$2.99M
EDU:
$716.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRM vs. EDU — Risk / Return Rank
VRM
EDU
VRM vs. EDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRM | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.00 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.21 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | -0.46 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRM vs. EDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum EDU drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRM and EDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRM | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -95.61% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.94% | -29.21% | -46.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.01% | -56.77% | -41.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.87% | -87.49% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.88% | -74.50% | -25.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.36% | -33.19% | -51.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.43% | 13.57% | +27.86% |
Volatility
VRM vs. EDU - Volatility Comparison
Vroom, Inc. (VRM) has a higher volatility of 42.71% compared to New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) at 9.19%. This indicates that VRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRM | EDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.71% | 9.19% | +33.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.95% | 23.84% | +58.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.79% | 35.11% | +62.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 262.48% | 70.54% | +191.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 239.04% | 59.59% | +179.45% |
Dividends
VRM vs. EDU - Dividend Comparison
VRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 2.47% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 1.28% |
VRM Vroom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VRM vs. EDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vroom, Inc. and New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VRM and EDU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRM has higher volatility (42.71%) compared to EDU (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRM dropped -99.93% vs EDU's -95.61%.
EDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRM and EDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer