PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRM vs. CCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRM vs. CCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRM achieves a -62.32% return, which is significantly lower than CCL's -7.96% return.


VRM

1D
8.55%
1M
-10.19%
6M
-61.11%
YTD
-62.32%
1Y
-72.51%
3Y*
-65.60%
5Y*
-69.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-62.75%

CCL

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-6.36%
YTD
-7.96%
1Y
-3.30%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
-3.48%
ALL TIME*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$556.93M$506.56M$697.10M
$29.13K$78.13K$241.20K

VRM vs. CCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VRM
Vroom, Inc.
-62.32%296.81%-89.61%-40.93%-90.55%-73.66%1.79%
CCL
Carnival Corporation & Plc
-7.96%22.55%34.41%130.02%-59.94%-7.11%-13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VRM and CCL is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2020

0.29

The correlation between VRM and CCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRM:

$39.01M

CCL:

$38.09B

EPS

VRM:

-$13.51

CCL:

$2.20

PS Ratio

VRM:

0.52

CCL:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRM:

$50.29M

CCL:

$27.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRM:

$24.05M

CCL:

$9.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRM:

-$2.99M

CCL:

$7.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRM vs. CCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRM
VRM Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CCL
CCL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRM vs. CCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRMCCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.02

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.19

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.55

-0.35

-1.20

VRM vs. CCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the CCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRM and CCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRM vs. CCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than CCL's maximum drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRM and CCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRMCCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-90.37%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.94%

-29.30%

-47.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.63%

-42.33%

-55.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.86%

-75.82%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.87%

-57.55%

-42.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.51%

-28.68%

-55.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.32%

15.88%

+29.44%

Volatility

VRM vs. CCL - Volatility Comparison

Vroom, Inc. (VRM) has a higher volatility of 21.77% compared to Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) at 10.77%. This indicates that VRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRMCCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.77%

10.77%

+11.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.98%

38.02%

+41.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.74%

47.54%

+51.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

262.56%

55.14%

+207.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

237.94%

57.71%

+180.23%

Dividends

VRM vs. CCL - Dividend Comparison

VRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCL
Carnival Corporation & Plc
1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%3.93%3.96%2.41%2.59%2.02%
VRM
Vroom, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRM vs. CCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vroom, Inc. and Carnival Corporation & Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VRM and CCL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRM has higher volatility (21.77%) compared to CCL (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRM dropped -99.93% vs CCL's -90.37%.

CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRM and CCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer