VRM vs. CCL
VRM (Vroom, Inc.) and CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — VRM in Auto & Truck Dealerships, CCL in Travel Services. Over the past 5 years, VRM returned -69.39%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for CCL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRM vs. CCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRM achieves a -54.12% return, which is significantly lower than CCL's -0.08% return.
VRM
- 1D
- -10.24%
- 1M
- -24.38%
- YTD
- -54.12%
- 6M
- -63.92%
- 1Y
- -71.34%
- 3Y*
- -55.34%
- 5Y*
- -69.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CCL
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 16.20%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- 28.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- -2.76%
VRM vs. CCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRM Vroom, Inc. | -54.12% | 296.81% | -89.61% | -40.93% | -90.55% | -73.66% | 1.79% |
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -0.08% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | -7.11% | -13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRM and CCL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between VRM and CCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VRM:
-$12.02
CCL:
$2.21
VRM:
0.70
CCL:
1.57
VRM:
$50.29M
CCL:
$26.98B
VRM:
$24.05M
CCL:
$10.13B
VRM:
-$2.99M
CCL:
$7.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRM vs. CCL — Risk / Return Rank
VRM
CCL
VRM vs. CCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.14 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.97 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | 1.95 | -3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRM vs. CCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than CCL's maximum drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRM and CCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -90.37% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.87% | -29.30% | -46.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.01% | -42.85% | -55.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.88% | -77.32% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -53.92% | -45.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -28.59% | -55.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.84% | 14.60% | +26.24% |
Volatility
VRM vs. CCL - Volatility Comparison
Vroom, Inc. (VRM) has a higher volatility of 44.81% compared to Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) at 14.66%. This indicates that VRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRM | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.81% | 14.66% | +30.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.37% | 39.03% | +42.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.69% | 47.52% | +49.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 262.46% | 55.64% | +206.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 239.96% | 57.71% | +182.25% |
Dividends
VRM vs. CCL - Dividend Comparison
VRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
VRM Vroom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VRM vs. CCL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vroom, Inc. and Carnival Corporation & Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VRM and CCL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRM has higher volatility (44.81%) compared to CCL (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRM dropped -99.93% vs CCL's -90.37%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRM and CCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer