VRM vs. ANET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET).

Performance

VRM vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VRM vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VRM Vroom, Inc.	-35.11%	296.81%	-89.61%	-40.93%	-90.55%	-73.66%	-14.47%
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	-4.72%	18.55%	87.73%	94.07%	-15.58%	97.89%	25.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRM : $67.08M ANET : $159.28B
EPS VRM : -$10.26 ANET : $2.76
PS Ratio VRM : 8.45 ANET : 17.67
PB Ratio VRM : 0.58 ANET : 12.88
Total Revenue (TTM) VRM : $7.91M ANET : $9.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) VRM : -$25.15M ANET : $5.77B
EBITDA (TTM) VRM : $2.03M ANET : $4.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRM achieves a -35.11% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's -4.72% return.

VRM

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: -5.63%
• YTD: -35.11%
• 6M: -51.52%
• 1Y: -56.27%
• 3Y*: -43.60%
• 5Y*: -66.67%
• 10Y*: —

ANET

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -16.36%
• 1Y: 59.06%
• 3Y*: 43.82%
• 5Y*: 45.34%
• 10Y*: 41.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VRM vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRM

VRM Risk / Return Rank: 14
VRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
VRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
VRM Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
VRM Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 74
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRM vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vroom, Inc. (VRM) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VRM	ANET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	1.10	-1.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	1.70	-2.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.22	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	2.16	-2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	4.77	-6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VRM vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRM and ANET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VRM	ANET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	1.10	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	0.99	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.79	-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between VRM and ANET is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VRM vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRM nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VRM vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRM drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRM and ANET.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRM	ANET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-52.20%	-47.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.54%	-28.33%	-46.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.89%	-50.42%	-49.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.78%	-22.95%	-76.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.67%	-15.48%	-68.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.67%	12.82%	+28.85%

Volatility

VRM vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

Vroom, Inc. (VRM) has a higher volatility of 44.88% compared to Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) at 18.49%. This indicates that VRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRM	ANET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.88%	18.49%	+26.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.65%	36.69%	+35.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.56%	53.90%	+33.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	261.33%	45.96%	+215.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	243.42%	44.40%	+199.02%

Financials