VRIG vs. SPTU
VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. VRIG is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. VRIG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
VRIG vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPTU's 1.48% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRIG vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.81% | 1.13% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and SPTU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
SPTU
VRIG vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRIG | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 62.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 320.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRIG | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 11.82 | -10.91 |
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -0.04% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.00% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
VRIG vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 0.32% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 0.32% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 0.32% | +3.48% |
VRIG vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRIG vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRIG and SPTU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRIG.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for VRIG and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer