PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRGWX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRGWX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VRGWX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 19.22%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.


VRGWX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.59%
6M
7.96%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
19.22%

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
8.59%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VRGWX and RYGRX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.91

The correlation between VRGWX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRGWX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRGWXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.53

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

13.56

-7.67

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRGWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRGWX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRGWXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.00

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.47

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.58

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.44

+0.47

Drawdowns

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRGWX drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRGWX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRGWXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-54.22%

+21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-11.17%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-24.95%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-36.57%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-36.63%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-9.41%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

2.91%

+1.90%

Volatility

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) is 3.32%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VRGWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRGWXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

6.39%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

16.30%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

19.71%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

23.50%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

22.88%

-1.72%

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRGWX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRGWX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

VRGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.43%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRGWX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VRGWX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRGWX dropped -32.70% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRGWX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer