VPN vs. UFOX
VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - VPN tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index while UFOX tracks the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPN returned 15.53%/yr vs 25.01%/yr for UFOX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UFOX.
Performance
VPN vs. UFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 52.56% return, which is significantly lower than UFOX's 66.80% return.
VPN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
UFOX
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 25.07%
- YTD
- 66.80%
- 6M
- 65.62%
- 1Y
- 129.67%
- 3Y*
- 50.00%
- 5Y*
- 25.01%
- 10Y*
- —
VPN vs. UFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 5.81% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 66.80% | 34.83% | 34.11% | 21.83% | -27.26% | 25.68% | 17.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPN and UFOX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VPN and UFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
VPN vs. UFOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPN
UFOX
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
VPN
UFOX
Technology
VPN
UFOX
Communication Services
VPN
UFOX
Financial Services
VPN
UFOX
-
Basic Materials
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Consumer Cyclical
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Consumer Defensive
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Energy
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Healthcare
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Industrials
VPN
-
UFOX
Utilities
VPN
-
UFOX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPN vs. UFOX — Risk / Return Rank
VPN
UFOX
VPN vs. UFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPN | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.90 | 5.12 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.71 | 5.70 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.74 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | 11.99 | -5.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | 47.68 | -26.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPN | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | 5.12 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
VPN vs. UFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than UFOX's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and UFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPN | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -33.90% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -11.04% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | -28.14% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.98% | -33.90% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -9.02% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 2.78% | +1.31% |
Volatility
VPN vs. UFOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) is 7.16%, while Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that VPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPN | UFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 9.32% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 20.09% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 25.51% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 24.58% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 25.21% | -3.31% |
VPN vs. UFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UFOX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPN vs. UFOX - Dividend Comparison
VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than UFOX's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPN and UFOX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFOX has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to VPN (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPN dropped -38.98% vs UFOX's -33.90%.
On 5-year performance, UFOX leads with 25.01% vs 15.53% for VPN. On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VPN has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFOX has performed better with a 25.01% return vs 15.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.
VPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.35% for UFOX.
VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 0.30% for UFOX.
UFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.12 vs 3.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPN and UFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer