PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPN vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPN vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 53.84% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 10.32% return.


VPN

1D
1.69%
1M
6.53%
YTD
53.84%
6M
55.86%
1Y
81.04%
3Y*
36.86%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*

VNQ

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.63%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPN vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
53.84%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
10.32%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VPN and VNQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between VPN and VNQ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPN vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPN
VPN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPN vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPNVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.16

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.32

1.42

+4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.47

4.45

+15.02

VPN vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPN Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPN and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPN vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-73.07%

+34.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-8.34%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-17.46%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

-34.48%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.95%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-13.60%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.66%

+1.52%

Volatility

VPN vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 5.03%. This indicates that VPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

5.03%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

10.15%

+8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.08%

13.81%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

18.85%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

20.75%

+1.32%

VPN vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPN vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than VNQ's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.61%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.71%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPN and VNQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPN has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to VNQ (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPN dropped -38.98% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 15.43% vs 2.52% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.71% for VPN.

VPN is categorized as Technology Equities, while VNQ is REIT. VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 0.13% for VNQ.

VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPN and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer