PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPN vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 49.19% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.


VPN

1D
-3.02%
1M
3.31%
YTD
49.19%
6M
51.34%
1Y
73.85%
3Y*
35.46%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-4.41%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
49.19%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
1.13%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VPN and BOTZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.67

The correlation between VPN and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VPN vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPN
BOTZ

Real Estate

58.0%

-

Technology

30.6%
31.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
4.4%

Financial Services

0.9%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Industrials

-

49.3%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Real Estate

VPN
58.0%
BOTZ

-

Technology

VPN
30.6%
BOTZ
31.8%

Communication Services

VPN
10.5%
BOTZ
4.4%

Financial Services

VPN
0.9%
BOTZ
0.9%

Basic Materials

VPN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VPN

-

BOTZ
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

VPN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

VPN

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Healthcare

VPN

-

BOTZ
8.0%

Industrials

VPN

-

BOTZ
49.3%

Utilities

VPN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPN
VPN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPNBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.15

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.76

1.04

+4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.72

3.34

+14.38

VPN vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPN Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPN and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-55.54%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-19.34%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-29.02%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

-55.54%

+16.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-11.99%

+8.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-18.27%

+5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

6.01%

-1.83%

Volatility

VPN vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) have volatilities of 9.71% and 10.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

10.19%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

20.13%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

25.54%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

27.03%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

25.83%

-3.73%

VPN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.74%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPN and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to VPN (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPN dropped -38.98% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 14.82% vs 1.10% for BOTZ. On fees, VPN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VPN has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

VPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.

VPN is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 0.68% for BOTZ.

VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPN and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer