VPL vs. FLIN
VPL (Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - VPL tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index while FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPL returned 10.36%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for FLIN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
VPL vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPL achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.
VPL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 30.29%
- 6M
- 33.07%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VPL vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 30.29% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -10.88% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -11.92% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPL and FLIN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between VPL and FLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
VPL vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPL
FLIN
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VPL
FLIN
Industrials
VPL
FLIN
Financial Services
VPL
FLIN
Consumer Cyclical
VPL
FLIN
Basic Materials
VPL
FLIN
Healthcare
VPL
FLIN
Communication Services
VPL
FLIN
Real Estate
VPL
FLIN
Consumer Defensive
VPL
FLIN
Energy
VPL
FLIN
Utilities
VPL
FLIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPL vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
VPL
FLIN
VPL vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPL | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.88 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | -0.62 | +4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.95 | -1.54 | +17.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPL | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | -0.78 | +3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.23 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
VPL vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPL drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPL and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPL | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -41.90% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -18.79% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -22.85% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.09% | -22.85% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -18.91% | +18.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -8.01% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 7.57% | -4.20% |
Volatility
VPL vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.21%. This indicates that VPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPL | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.32% | 5.21% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.71% | 12.81% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 14.92% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 15.74% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 20.45% | -3.16% |
VPL vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPL vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.73% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPL and FLIN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPL has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPL dropped -55.49% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
On 5-year performance, VPL leads with 10.36% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, VPL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VPL has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.
VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VPL and 0.19% for FLIN.
VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPL and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer