VPL vs. EMMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF).
VPL and EMMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.
Performance
VPL vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VPL vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 8.11% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -10.48% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPL achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than EMMF's 5.23% return.
VPL
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VPL vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VPL vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
VPL
EMMF
VPL vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.66 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 2.25 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.58 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.94 | 10.52 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.66 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.39 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between VPL and EMMF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VPL vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than EMMF's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.28% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VPL vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPL drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPL and EMMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -32.57% | -22.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -10.62% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.09% | -25.20% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.28% | -7.68% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -7.58% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.61% | +0.64% |
Volatility
VPL vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) at 9.11%. This indicates that VPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VPL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 9.11% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 12.48% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 16.91% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 14.01% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 16.45% | +0.65% |