VPC vs. YCS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPC returned 1.21%/yr vs 24.30%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. VPC charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

VPC vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -9.62% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 11.45% return.

VPC

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: -12.85%
• YTD: -9.62%
• 1Y: -17.33%
• 3Y*: 0.37%
• 5Y*: 1.21%
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 8.08%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: 24.30%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPC vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF	-9.62%	-6.75%	10.52%	22.20%	-11.70%	34.18%	-9.50%	9.25%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	11.45%	9.04%	35.41%	28.70%	29.09%	22.38%	-11.18%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VPC and YCS is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019	-0.01

Return for Risk

VPC vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPC

VPC Risk / Return Rank: 2
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 73
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPC vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VPC	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.28	1.82	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.78	2.30	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.35	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	3.61	-4.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	11.41	-12.74

VPC vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPC Sharpe Ratio is -1.28, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPC and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VPC vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPC	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.45%	-49.56%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.76%	-8.30%	-14.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.86%	-23.05%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	-27.32%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.95%	0.00%	-19.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-19.80%	+11.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.08%	2.62%	+10.46%

Volatility

VPC vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.47%. This indicates that VPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VPC	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	2.47%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	11.85%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	16.54%	-2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	21.09%	-7.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	18.70%	+1.75%

VPC vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VPC vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.11%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF	16.11%	14.33%	11.26%	11.71%	10.74%	6.31%	10.06%	8.19%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VPC and YCS in my portfolio?

VPC and YCS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VPC or YCS?

VPC has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to YCS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, VPC or YCS?

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 24.30% vs 1.21% for VPC. On fees, VPC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VPC or YCS?

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VPC or YCS?

VPC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VPC or YCS?

VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.11%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between VPC and YCS?

VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. VPC tracks Indxx Private Credit Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.