PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPAC.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPAC.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than BBUD.L's 9.91% return.


VPAC.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*

BBUD.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.66%
6M
8.97%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VPAC.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.04%6.34%10.84%9.27%-9.70%3.64%4.81%8.27%
BBUD.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)
9.91%17.41%25.12%27.64%-19.95%27.63%20.16%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VPAC.L and BBUD.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019

0.53

The correlation between VPAC.L and BBUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPAC.L
VPAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUD.L
BBUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BBUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPAC.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPAC.LBBUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.46

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

10.00

-0.01

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the BBUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPAC.L and BBUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPAC.L drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUD.L drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPAC.L and BBUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPAC.LBBUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-34.19%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-8.61%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-19.33%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-25.33%

+11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.66%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-5.30%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

2.12%

-1.60%

Volatility

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPAC.L) is 0.74%, while JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that VPAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPAC.LBBUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

3.03%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

9.43%

-7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

12.14%

-8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.30%

16.21%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.00%

17.73%

-6.73%

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUD.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPAC.L vs. BBUD.L - Dividend Comparison

VPAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUD.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)
1.10%1.10%1.01%1.29%1.46%0.95%1.37%0.74%
VPAC.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPAC.L and BBUD.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.

VPAC.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BBUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VPAC.L tracks ICE Diversified Variable Rate Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while BBUD.L tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPAC.L and 0.05% for BBUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPAC.L and BBUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer