PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPAC.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than VRPS.L's 2.20% return.


VPAC.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.03%
6M
1.83%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*

VRPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.79%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VPAC.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD
2.04%6.34%10.84%9.27%-9.70%3.64%4.81%17.14%-1.27%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
2.20%6.33%10.82%9.27%-9.73%3.63%4.19%17.74%-1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VPAC.L and VRPS.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between VPAC.L and VRPS.L has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPAC.L
VPAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VRPS.L
VRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPAC.LVRPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.59

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

9.56

+0.42

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPAC.L and VRPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPAC.L drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, roughly equal to the maximum VRPS.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPAC.L and VRPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPAC.LVRPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-34.22%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-2.11%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-3.45%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-13.90%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.28%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-3.23%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.57%

-0.05%

Volatility

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L) at 0.68%. This indicates that VPAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPAC.LVRPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.68%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

2.82%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

3.88%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.30%

5.34%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.00%

10.84%

+0.16%

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VPAC.L and VRPS.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

VPAC.L vs. VRPS.L - Dividend Comparison

VPAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VPAC.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
5.14%4.99%4.98%4.97%4.60%3.72%3.97%4.33%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPAC.L and VRPS.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPAC.L and VRPS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD, while VRPS.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPAC.L and VRPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer