VOOV vs. INCE
VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. VOOV is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOOV returned 11.80%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for INCE. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
VOOV vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than INCE's 16.43% return.
VOOV
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.28M | $6.86M | $3.18M | |
| $18.18M | $15.18M | $15.44M |
VOOV vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 12.00% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 16.43% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOV and INCE is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VOOV and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOOV vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOV
INCE
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
VOOV
INCE
Financial Services
VOOV
INCE
Healthcare
VOOV
INCE
Industrials
VOOV
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
VOOV
INCE
Consumer Defensive
VOOV
INCE
Energy
VOOV
INCE
Utilities
VOOV
INCE
Basic Materials
VOOV
INCE
Real Estate
VOOV
INCE
-
Communication Services
VOOV
INCE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOV vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
VOOV
INCE
VOOV vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOV | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.61 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 5.49 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 21.17 | -7.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOV vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOV | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -33.95% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -4.90% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -14.01% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -18.40% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -3.21% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.27% | +0.35% |
Volatility
VOOV vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.41%. This indicates that VOOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOV | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 2.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 6.17% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 8.34% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 13.26% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 15.59% | +1.30% |
VOOV vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOV vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than INCE's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOV and INCE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOOV has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to INCE (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 11.80% vs 10.75% for INCE. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 1.64% for VOOV.
VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOV and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer