PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 10.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOOV having a 11.62% annualized return and ILCV not far behind at 11.48%.


VOOV

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.92%
6M
6.95%
YTD
9.30%
1Y
18.32%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.62%

ILCV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.76%
6M
8.23%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
9.30%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
10.33%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and ILCV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VOOV and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOV
ILCV

Technology

21.9%
24.7%

Financial Services

14.4%
16.5%

Healthcare

11.5%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.6%

Industrials

10.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
7.5%

Energy

7.0%
6.0%

Utilities

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.3%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
7.9%

Technology

VOOV
21.9%
ILCV
24.7%

Financial Services

VOOV
14.4%
ILCV
16.5%

Healthcare

VOOV
11.5%
ILCV
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOV
11.1%
ILCV
9.6%

Industrials

VOOV
10.6%
ILCV
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOOV
8.9%
ILCV
7.5%

Energy

VOOV
7.0%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

VOOV
4.3%
ILCV
3.5%

Basic Materials

VOOV
3.5%
ILCV
2.4%

Real Estate

VOOV
3.3%
ILCV
2.1%

Communication Services

VOOV
3.0%
ILCV
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.73

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

15.28

-4.16

VOOV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-58.63%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-6.55%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-14.95%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-18.58%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-35.53%

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.55%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-9.28%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.60%

+0.05%

Volatility

VOOV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.41%, while iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.62%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

7.26%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

10.00%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.62%

+0.26%

VOOV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than ILCV's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.58%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VOOV and ILCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCV has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to VOOV (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 11.62% vs 11.48% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.58% for ILCV.

VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer