PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. FITLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. FITLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than FITLX's 8.86% return.


VOOG

1D
2.86%
1M
1.56%
YTD
12.80%
6M
14.09%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
26.64%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
18.26%

FITLX

1D
0.73%
1M
0.55%
YTD
8.86%
6M
9.40%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. FITLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.80%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%14.09%
FITLX
Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
8.86%18.77%23.59%29.04%-20.28%31.55%18.69%31.54%-3.32%13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and FITLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.94

The correlation between VOOG and FITLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. FITLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FITLX
FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. FITLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGFITLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.26

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

9.69

-0.03

VOOG vs. FITLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FITLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and FITLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. FITLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FITLX drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and FITLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGFITLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-34.35%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-11.15%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-19.99%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-26.91%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-1.89%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.06%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.60%

+0.81%

Volatility

VOOG vs. FITLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) at 4.88%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FITLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGFITLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

4.88%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

10.54%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

13.29%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

17.65%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

19.11%

+1.70%

VOOG vs. FITLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FITLX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. FITLX - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FITLX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITLX
Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
1.02%1.11%1.29%1.12%1.49%0.99%1.01%1.41%1.58%0.76%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VOOG and FITLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to FITLX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs FITLX's -34.35%.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and FITLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer