VOOG vs. 3199.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and 3199.HK (ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while 3199.HK is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOG returned 17.29%/yr vs 2.87%/yr for 3199.HK. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for 3199.HK.

Performance

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VOOG is traded in USD, while 3199.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3199.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than 3199.HK's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed 3199.HK with an annualized return of 17.29%, while 3199.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.87% annualized return.

VOOG

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -2.33%
• 6M: 9.02%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 24.32%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 17.29%
• ALL TIME*: 16.66%

3199.HK

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 4.73%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 1Y: 7.38%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: 2.74%
• 10Y*: 2.87%
• ALL TIME*: 2.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	9.56%	22.11%	35.89%	29.96%	-29.48%	31.95%	33.35%	30.93%	-0.21%	27.19%
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	5.26%	5.32%	3.75%	2.31%	-6.32%	6.64%	11.23%	1.05%	0.35%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and 3199.HK is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014	0.07

Return for Risk

VOOG vs. 3199.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG

VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 42
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

3199.HK

3199.HK Risk / Return Rank: 77
3199.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
3199.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
3199.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 68
3199.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
3199.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOOG	3199.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.64	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.50	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	5.15	-3.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	17.16	-11.45

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the 3199.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and 3199.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, which is greater than 3199.HK's maximum drawdown of -12.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and 3199.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOOG	3199.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-12.60%	-20.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.71%	-1.56%	-12.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.18%	-3.79%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.73%	-11.56%	-21.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.73%	-12.60%	-20.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.75%	-0.40%	-4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-3.35%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	0.47%	+3.14%

Volatility

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) at 1.34%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3199.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOOG	3199.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	1.34%	+4.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	3.80%	+10.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.43%	4.92%	+12.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	5.48%	+15.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	6.62%	+14.21%

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 3199.HK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOOG vs. 3199.HK - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than 3199.HK's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	2.50%	3.34%	3.42%	3.51%	3.65%	3.40%	3.29%	3.57%	3.61%	3.39%	3.55%	3.68%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.49%	1.12%	0.93%	0.53%	0.88%	1.26%	1.34%	1.32%	1.47%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOOG and 3199.HK in my portfolio?

VOOG and 3199.HK have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOOG or 3199.HK?

On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOOG or 3199.HK?

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for 3199.HK.

What is the main difference between VOOG and 3199.HK?

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while 3199.HK is Emerging Markets Bonds. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while 3199.HK tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and CSOP. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.62% for 3199.HK.