PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. ZPRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while ZPRV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRV.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRV.DE's 13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed ZPRV.DE with an annualized return of 15.23%, while ZPRV.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%

ZPRV.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
13.25%
6M
13.72%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
13.25%16.27%7.55%22.88%-10.52%36.39%7.74%24.72%-15.93%9.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and ZPRV.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.44

The correlation between VOO and ZPRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOZPRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.55

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

14.35

-0.82

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and ZPRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOZPRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.28

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.45

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.53

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.48

+0.40

Drawdowns

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and ZPRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOZPRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-49.34%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.03%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-28.19%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-28.19%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-49.34%

+15.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

0.00%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-7.83%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.55%

-0.63%

Volatility

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOZPRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.97%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

9.84%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

16.00%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

21.32%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

23.02%

-5.00%

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while ZPRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and ZPRV.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while ZPRV.DE is Small Cap Value Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and ZPRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer