PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. WDNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VOO vs. WDNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VOO vs. WDNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.55%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%14.57%
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund
4.67%22.68%-14.18%-2.07%-26.29%-5.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly lower than WDNA's 4.67% return.


VOO

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.19%

WDNA

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
4.67%
6M
9.47%
1Y
48.82%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VOO vs. WDNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than WDNA's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. WDNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

WDNA
WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. WDNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOWDNADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.53

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

2.20

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.07

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

9.18

-2.05

VOO vs. WDNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the WDNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and WDNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOWDNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.53

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.23

+1.06

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and WDNA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VOO vs. WDNA - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than WDNA's 4.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund
4.36%4.57%0.75%0.80%0.38%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VOO vs. WDNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum WDNA drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and WDNA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOWDNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-58.87%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-11.70%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-32.62%

+27.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-35.78%

+32.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

5.19%

-2.62%

Volatility

VOO vs. WDNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 5.27%, while WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VOOWDNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

8.42%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

18.38%

-8.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

29.48%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

25.16%

-8.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

25.16%

-7.18%