PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. VECA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. VECA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while VECA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VECA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than VECA.L's -0.68% return.


VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%

VECA.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
0.31%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
-0.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. VECA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%18.35%
VECA.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.67%16.56%-2.05%11.03%-18.33%-8.32%11.64%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and VECA.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. VECA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VECA.L
VECA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VECA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VECA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VECA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VECA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VECA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. VECA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOVECA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.55

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

1.56

+11.96

VOO vs. VECA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the VECA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and VECA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOVECA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.48

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.09

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.13

+0.74

Drawdowns

VOO vs. VECA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum VECA.L drawdown of -34.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and VECA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVECA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-34.75%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.67%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-8.48%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-33.57%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-6.19%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-11.80%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.34%

-0.42%

Volatility

VOO vs. VECA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VECA.L) at 2.23%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VECA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVECA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.23%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

5.88%

+3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

7.67%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

9.54%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

9.44%

+8.58%

VOO vs. VECA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VECA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. VECA.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while VECA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VECA.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and VECA.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VECA.L.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while VECA.L is European Corporate Bonds. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VECA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.09% for VECA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and VECA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer