PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VOO vs. SUSW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VOO vs. SUSW.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and SUSW.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SUSW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.39%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for SUSW.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUSW.L.

Performance

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while SUSW.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SUSW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than SUSW.L's 10.05% return.

VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%

SUSW.L

1D
0.34%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.05%
6M
11.41%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%4.75%
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		10.03%15.57%11.03%24.60%-21.42%26.41%20.56%29.75%-7.61%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and SUSW.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.58

The correlation between VOO and SUSW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VOO
SUSW.L

Technology

35.7%
30.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
17.1%

Communication Services

11.3%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.2%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.2%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.0%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
SUSW.L
30.6%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
SUSW.L
17.1%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
SUSW.L
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
SUSW.L
9.2%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
SUSW.L
9.3%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
SUSW.L
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
SUSW.L
6.2%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
SUSW.L

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
SUSW.L
1.8%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
SUSW.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
SUSW.L
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV
Often compared with SUSW.L:
SUSW.L vs. SPYSUSW.L vs. VTSUSW.L vs. ICLNSUSW.L vs. NASD.LSUSW.L vs. AIAI.LSUSW.L vs. XESC.LSUSW.L vs. XSPX.L

Return for Risk

VOO vs. SUSW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
SUSW.L
SUSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VOOSUSW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.15
1.56

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.89
2.36

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.12

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

8.24

+5.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and SUSW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VOOSUSW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.56

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.71

+0.17

Drawdowns

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SUSW.L drawdown of -32.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SUSW.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VOOSUSW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-32.58%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.61%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-18.19%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-29.31%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

0.00%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.78%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.49%

-0.57%

Volatility

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VOOSUSW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.84%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

10.17%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

13.02%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

16.12%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.21%

+0.81%

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSW.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOO vs. SUSW.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while SUSW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

VOO and SUSW.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUSW.L.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while SUSW.L is Global Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.20% for SUSW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and SUSW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer