VOO vs. NVDG.F
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while NVDG.F (NVIDIA Corporation CDR) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, VOO returned 20.95%/yr vs 68.42%/yr for NVDG.F. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VOO is traded in USD, while NVDG.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NVDG.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG.F's 13.45% return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
NVDG.F
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 41.10%
- 3Y*
- 68.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -9.64% |
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 13.45% | 35.40% | 159.49% | 239.31% | -40.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and NVDG.F is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022 | 0.29 |
The correlation between VOO and NVDG.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. NVDG.F — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
NVDG.F
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.20 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.22 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 5.19 | +7.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum NVDG.F drawdown of -64.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and NVDG.F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -64.73% | +30.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -20.95% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -39.19% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -10.91% | +8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -16.94% | +13.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 8.99% | -7.02% |
Volatility
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 12.52% | -8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 29.29% | -19.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 43.26% | -30.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 62.45% | -45.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 62.45% | -44.42% |
Dividends
VOO vs. NVDG.F - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than NVDG.F's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 0.11% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and NVDG.F have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VOO and NVDG.F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer