PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. MIVU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while MIVU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MIVU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than MIVU.DE's 1.94% return.


VOO

1D
1.74%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.51%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.72%

MIVU.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.88%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.99%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-11.56%
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
1.94%8.52%15.86%8.69%-9.56%21.48%3.89%27.26%-6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and MIVU.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2018

0.47

The correlation between VOO and MIVU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. MIVU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVU.DE
MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOMIVU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.10

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

0.87

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

2.62

+11.63

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and MIVU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MIVU.DE drawdown of -33.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and MIVU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOMIVU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-33.16%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-5.50%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-11.17%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-17.58%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.61%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-4.27%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.83%

+0.14%

Volatility

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) at 2.27%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOMIVU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.27%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

5.69%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

8.33%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

12.06%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

14.21%

+3.84%

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. MIVU.DE - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while MIVU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and MIVU.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while MIVU.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and MIVU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer