VOO vs. IDTP.L
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IDTP.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IDTP.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.23%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for IDTP.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IDTP.L.
Performance
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than IDTP.L's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IDTP.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while IDTP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
IDTP.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.45% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.09% | 6.94% | 2.15% | 3.71% | -12.76% | 6.17% | 10.98% | 8.68% | -1.43% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IDTP.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | -0.05 |
The correlation between VOO and IDTP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IDTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IDTP.L
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.48 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 6.88 | +6.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.26 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.16 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.41 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.51 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -15.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IDTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -15.12% | -18.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -1.92% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -4.51% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -15.12% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -15.12% | -18.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -0.61% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -4.22% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.69% | +1.23% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 1.30% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 2.66% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 3.78% | +8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 6.13% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 6.37% | +11.65% |
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and IDTP.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IDTP.L.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IDTP.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.12% for IDTP.L.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IDTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer