VOO vs. FTAL.L
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FTAL.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for FTAL.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FTAL.L.
Performance
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VOO is traded in USD, while FTAL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FTAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than FTAL.L's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed FTAL.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while FTAL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
FTAL.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 6.65% | 32.49% | 7.21% | 13.61% | -10.20% | 16.12% | -7.20% | 24.06% | -14.81% | 23.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and FTAL.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between VOO and FTAL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
FTAL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
FTAL.L
Financial Services
VOO
FTAL.L
Communication Services
VOO
FTAL.L
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
FTAL.L
Healthcare
VOO
FTAL.L
Industrials
VOO
FTAL.L
Consumer Defensive
VOO
FTAL.L
Energy
VOO
FTAL.L
Utilities
VOO
FTAL.L
Real Estate
VOO
FTAL.L
Basic Materials
VOO
FTAL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. FTAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
FTAL.L
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.87 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 6.17 | +6.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FTAL.L drawdown of -43.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FTAL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -43.10% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.92% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -13.73% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -28.40% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -43.10% | +9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -3.30% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -7.78% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.01% | -1.04% |
Volatility
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.71% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 11.47% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 13.63% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.62% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 18.29% | -0.26% |
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAL.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. FTAL.L - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and FTAL.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAL.L.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FTAL.L is Europe Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.20% for FTAL.L.
Find the right allocation for VOO and FTAL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer