VOO vs. DFAS

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. VOO is passively managed, while DFAS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.93%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for DFAS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for DFAS.

Performance

VOO vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than DFAS's 15.89% return.

VOO

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 13.93%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

DFAS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 6.49%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 13.64%
• 1Y: 32.03%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.99%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	13.08%
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	15.89%	8.17%	10.21%	17.83%	-13.84%	4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and DFAS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021	0.81

The correlation between VOO and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	DFAS
Technology	35.6%	15.1%
Financial Services	11.6%	19.2%
Communication Services	11.1%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	13.0%
Healthcare	8.5%	12.0%
Industrials	8.0%	18.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.2%
Energy	3.5%	6.4%
Utilities	2.8%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.2%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DFAS

DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 67
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOO	DFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.90	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.76	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.33	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.44	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.25	11.81	+2.44

VOO vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOO vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and DFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	DFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-26.13%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-9.36%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-26.13%	+7.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-26.13%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	0.00%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-8.26%	+4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.72%	-0.75%

Volatility

VOO vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.61%, while Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	DFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	5.17%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	11.88%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	16.98%	-4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	20.85%	-3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	20.84%	-2.79%

VOO vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than DFAS's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	0.90%	0.99%	0.93%	1.00%	1.03%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and DFAS in my portfolio?

VOO and DFAS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOO or DFAS?

DFAS has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to VOO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

Which ETF is better, VOO or DFAS?

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.93% vs 8.05% for DFAS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOO or DFAS?

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.93% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or DFAS?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOO or DFAS?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.90% for DFAS.

What is the main difference between VOO and DFAS?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.34% for DFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.