VOO vs. CSW
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, VOO returned 27.95% vs -5.19% for CSW. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VOO vs. CSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than CSW's -6.92% return.
VOO
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
CSW
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -13.70%
- 1Y
- -5.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO vs. CSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.99% | 14.89% |
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | -6.92% | -4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and CSW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. CSW — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
CSW
VOO vs. CSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.01 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | -0.21 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | -0.35 | +14.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. CSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than CSW's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and CSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -25.35% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -24.56% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -18.49% | +17.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -13.88% | +10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 14.93% | -12.96% |
Volatility
VOO vs. CSW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.61%, while CSW Industrials Inc (CSW) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 12.20% | -7.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 30.57% | -20.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 40.35% | -28.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 40.29% | -23.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 40.29% | -22.24% |
Dividends
VOO vs. CSW - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than CSW's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and CSW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSW has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to VOO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs CSW's -25.35%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and CSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer