PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. BBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than BBEM's 23.17% return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
0.37%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

BBEM

1D
0.30%
1M
4.34%
YTD
23.17%
6M
25.34%
1Y
45.68%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%16.57%
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
23.17%32.43%5.61%6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and BBEM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.66

The correlation between VOO and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOBBEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.36

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

12.61

-0.19

VOO vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and BBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOBBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-17.42%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-13.12%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-17.42%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-4.30%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-3.72%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.49%

-1.52%

Volatility

VOO vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOBBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

10.58%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

19.04%

-9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

21.07%

-8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.01%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.01%

+0.02%

VOO vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than BBEM's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.74%5.86%2.73%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and BBEM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEM has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 20.95% vs 20.75% for BBEM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 20.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBEM.

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while BBEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.15% for BBEM.

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and BBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer