VONG vs. QCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR).
VONG and QCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both VONG and QCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VONG vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VONG vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 7.14% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -6.67% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than QCLR's -6.67% return.
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
QCLR
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VONG vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
QCLR
VONG vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONG | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 4.33 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONG | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.53 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and QCLR is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VONG vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than QCLR's 15.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.95% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and QCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -21.77% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -10.22% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.09% | -8.78% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -6.32% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 2.50% | +2.22% |
Volatility
VONG vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 3.86% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 8.53% | +3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 12.06% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 12.61% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 12.61% | +8.21% |