VONG vs. NACP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VONG returned 13.07%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.

Performance

VONG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 20.21% return.

VONG

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 18.39%

NACP

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 20.21%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 39.41%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	1.56%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-12.14%
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	20.21%	21.38%	23.93%	29.69%	-23.05%	27.62%	26.00%	30.74%	-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and NACP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018	0.87

The correlation between VONG and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VONG	NACP
Technology	54.1%	41.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	10.9%
Communication Services	12.0%	9.0%
Healthcare	6.9%	8.5%
Industrials	4.9%	8.0%
Financial Services	4.8%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	3.1%
Utilities	1.0%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.1%
Energy	0.4%	4.3%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.4%

Return for Risk

VONG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 29
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NACP

NACP Risk / Return Rank: 84
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VONG	NACP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.60	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	3.39	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.45	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	4.10	-2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	17.54	-13.90

VONG vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VONG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and NACP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONG	NACP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.72%	-30.96%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-9.65%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.27%	-19.66%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-27.89%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	-2.27%	-4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-5.72%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	2.25%	+2.72%

Volatility

VONG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 6.04%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VONG	NACP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	6.98%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	12.73%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	15.25%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.45%	17.69%	+3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	18.77%	+2.15%

VONG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than NACP's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	0.56%	0.62%	2.96%	1.28%	3.48%	3.06%	1.48%	1.22%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONG and NACP in my portfolio?

VONG and NACP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VONG or NACP?

NACP has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to VONG (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs NACP's -30.96%.

Which ETF is better, VONG or NACP?

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.31% vs 13.07% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VONG or NACP?

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONG or NACP?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONG or NACP?

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.

What is the main difference between VONG and NACP?

VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.49% for NACP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.