PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-11.83%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and NACP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.87

The correlation between VONG and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
NACP

Technology

51.4%
35.8%

Communication Services

13.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
11.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
9.2%

Industrials

5.7%
8.7%

Financial Services

5.3%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.3%

Energy

0.4%
5.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.5%

Utilities

0.3%
3.4%

Technology

VONG
51.4%
NACP
35.8%

Communication Services

VONG
13.2%
NACP
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
13.2%
NACP
11.1%

Healthcare

VONG
7.1%
NACP
9.2%

Industrials

VONG
5.7%
NACP
8.7%

Financial Services

VONG
5.3%
NACP
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.7%
NACP
3.6%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
NACP
1.3%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
NACP
5.0%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
NACP
1.5%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
NACP
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONGNACPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

3.14

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

4.17

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

4.56

-2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.34

20.04

-14.70

VONG vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONGNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

3.14

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.92

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.93

-0.03

Drawdowns

VONG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-30.96%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-9.65%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-19.66%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-27.89%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.13%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-5.75%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

2.19%

+2.64%

Volatility

VONG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 3.60%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.44%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

11.13%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

14.02%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

17.47%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

18.70%

+2.17%

VONG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VONG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONG and NACP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to VONG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 15.38% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 15.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer