PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VONG vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VONG vs. BND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.77%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

VONG vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 18.77%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.

VONG

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.89%
YTD
8.61%
6M
7.89%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
18.77%

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF		8.61%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		0.46%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and BND is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

-0.04

The correlation between VONG and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

Often compared with VONG:
VONG vs. VUGVONG vs. VOOVONG vs. VOOGVONG vs. QQQMVONG vs. IWFVONG vs. VONEVONG vs. MGK
Often compared with BND:
BND vs. BNDXBND vs. FXNAXBND vs. AGGBND vs. FBNDBND vs. BNDWBND vs. TLTBND vs. VBTLX

Return for Risk

VONG vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VONGBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.38

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.07

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.85

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.02

5.66

+0.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VONG vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VONGBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.38

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.03

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.29

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.59

+0.32

Drawdowns

VONG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and BND.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VONGBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-18.58%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-2.68%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-5.92%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-17.91%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-18.58%

-14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-2.18%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-3.06%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

0.88%

+3.95%

Volatility

VONG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.26%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VONGBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

1.26%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

2.68%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

3.78%

+11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

6.02%

+15.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

5.53%

+15.34%

VONG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VONG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF		0.42%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

VONG and BND have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to BND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 1.60% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 1.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.03% for BND.

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer