VONE vs. VCLT
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while VCLT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONE returned 15.46%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for VCLT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
VONE vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VONE has outperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 15.46%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.
VONE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
VONE vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 9.48% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 20.95% | 31.12% | -4.84% | 21.55% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 13.27% | 23.89% | -7.04% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and VCLT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, VONE and VCLT have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
VCLT
VONE vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONE | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.14 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.22 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 2.95 | +10.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONE vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -34.31% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -5.25% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -13.03% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -34.31% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | -34.31% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -14.12% | +12.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -8.17% | +4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.17% | -0.19% |
Volatility
VONE vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) at 1.91%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 1.91% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 5.84% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 7.84% | +4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 12.76% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 12.85% | +5.44% |
VONE vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONE vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VCLT's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.53% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONE and VCLT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONE has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VCLT (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs VCLT's -34.31%.
On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 2.24% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VONE.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 1.03% for VONE.
VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VCLT is Corporate Bonds. VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.03% for VCLT.
VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer