VONE vs. DFUV
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. VONE is passively managed, while DFUV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VONE returned 21.14%/yr vs 18.68%/yr for DFUV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFUV.
Performance
VONE vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than DFUV's 16.05% return.
VONE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
DFUV
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 32.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONE vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 8.46% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -5.97% |
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 16.05% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and DFUV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VONE and DFUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONE vs. DFUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONE
DFUV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VONE
DFUV
Financial Services
VONE
DFUV
Communication Services
VONE
DFUV
Consumer Cyclical
VONE
DFUV
Industrials
VONE
DFUV
Healthcare
VONE
DFUV
Consumer Defensive
VONE
DFUV
Energy
VONE
DFUV
Utilities
VONE
DFUV
Real Estate
VONE
DFUV
Basic Materials
VONE
DFUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
DFUV
VONE vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONE | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.49 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 5.51 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 19.90 | -7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONE | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.78 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VONE vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than DFUV's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and DFUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -17.60% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -6.01% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -17.60% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -1.36% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -3.64% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.66% | +0.27% |
Volatility
VONE vs. DFUV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) at 3.39%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.39% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 8.69% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 11.93% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.25% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.25% | +2.02% |
VONE vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONE vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than DFUV's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONE and DFUV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONE has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to DFUV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs DFUV's -17.60%.
On 3-year performance, VONE leads with 21.14% vs 18.68% for DFUV. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VONE has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.
DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.01% for VONE.
VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFUV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.21% for DFUV.
DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and DFUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer