VOLT vs. CCNR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) and CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOLT is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VOLT returned 62.39% vs 55.12% for CCNR. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOLT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CCNR.

Performance

VOLT vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than CCNR's 21.92% return.

VOLT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 36.32%
• 6M: 35.03%
• 1Y: 62.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCNR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 23.45%
• 1Y: 55.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLT vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	36.32%	25.92%	-8.98%
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	21.92%	46.48%	-6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and CCNR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.50

The correlation between VOLT and CCNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOLT vs. CCNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOLT	CCNR
Industrials	46.7%	7.3%
Utilities	31.8%	9.7%
Technology	12.2%	0.3%
Energy	5.1%	41.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	0.3%
Financial Services	0.5%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	33.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

VOLT vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 91
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 93
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOLT	CCNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	3.05	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.71	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.35	7.25	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.90	25.70	-7.80

VOLT vs. CCNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the CCNR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and CCNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and CCNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLT	CCNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-20.06%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-7.85%	-1.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	-5.21%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-3.58%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	2.21%	+1.19%

Volatility

VOLT vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison

Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) at 6.78%. This indicates that VOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOLT	CCNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.23%	6.78%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.19%	13.94%	+4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	18.66%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.40%	20.14%	+4.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	20.14%	+4.26%

VOLT vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLT vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than CCNR's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	2.86%	3.48%	1.27%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.33%	0.46%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLT and CCNR in my portfolio?

VOLT and CCNR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOLT or CCNR?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to CCNR (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs CCNR's -20.06%.

Which ETF is better, VOLT or CCNR?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 62.39% vs 55.12% for CCNR. On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CCNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOLT or CCNR?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 62.39% return vs 55.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOLT or CCNR?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOLT or CCNR?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.33% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between VOLT and CCNR?

VOLT is categorized as Energy Equities, while CCNR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Tema and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VOLT and 0.39% for CCNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.