VNT vs. ALAB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VNT (Vontier Corporation) and ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — VNT in Scientific & Technical Instruments, ALAB in Semiconductors. Over the past year, VNT returned -20.11% vs 282.87% for ALAB. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VNT vs. ALAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vontier Corporation (VNT) and Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNT achieves a -23.59% return, which is significantly lower than ALAB's 113.85% return.

VNT

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -19.25%
• YTD: -23.59%
• 6M: -20.29%
• 1Y: -20.11%
• 3Y*: -1.77%
• 5Y*: -3.25%
• 10Y*: —

ALAB

• 1D: 11.14%
• 1M: 75.53%
• YTD: 113.85%
• 6M: 148.89%
• 1Y: 282.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNT vs. ALAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VNT Vontier Corporation	-23.59%	2.22%	-17.91%
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.	113.85%	25.60%	113.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VNT and ALAB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap VNT : $4.05B ALAB : $64.45B
EPS VNT : $2.83 ALAB : $1.48
PE Ratio VNT : 10.03 ALAB : 239.63
PS Ratio VNT : 1.34 ALAB : 64.04
PB Ratio VNT : 3.21 ALAB : 43.14
Total Revenue (TTM) VNT : $3.09B ALAB : $1.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) VNT : $1.10B ALAB : $760.99M
EBITDA (TTM) VNT : $668.80M ALAB : $253.12M

Return for Risk

VNT vs. ALAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNT

VNT Risk / Return Rank: 13
VNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
VNT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
VNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
VNT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ALAB

ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 89
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNT vs. ALAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontier Corporation (VNT) and Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VNT	ALAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	3.02	-3.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	3.06	-3.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.39	-0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	4.85	-5.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	9.58	-11.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VNT vs. ALAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ALAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNT and ALAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VNT	ALAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.67	3.02	-3.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	1.32	-1.31

Drawdowns

VNT vs. ALAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNT drawdown since its inception was -54.48%, smaller than the maximum ALAB drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNT and ALAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNT	ALAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.48%	-63.69%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.28%	-60.19%	+23.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.07%	0.00%	-37.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.63%	-29.90%	+11.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.07%	30.49%	-16.42%

Volatility

VNT vs. ALAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vontier Corporation (VNT) is 14.27%, while Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a volatility of 29.37%. This indicates that VNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNT	ALAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.27%	29.37%	-15.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.17%	70.88%	-47.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.18%	94.42%	-64.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.58%	92.63%	-62.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.45%	92.63%	-62.18%

Dividends

VNT vs. ALAB - Dividend Comparison

VNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ALAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNT Vontier Corporation	0.35%	0.27%	0.27%	0.29%	0.52%	0.24%

Financials

VNT vs. ALAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vontier Corporation and Astera Labs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vontier Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 750.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

VNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vontier Corporation reported an operating income of 134.80M and revenue of 750.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

VNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vontier Corporation reported a net income of 94.30M and revenue of 750.60M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNT and ALAB in my portfolio?

VNT and ALAB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNT or ALAB?

ALAB has higher volatility (29.37%) compared to VNT (14.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNT dropped -54.48% vs ALAB's -63.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.