PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNSE vs. QMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VNSE vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF (VNSE) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VNSE vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNSE
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
-4.57%13.72%10.19%22.52%-16.74%30.21%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
2.66%10.89%16.11%35.47%-16.56%12.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNSE achieves a -4.57% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 2.66% return.


VNSE

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
-4.57%
6M
-4.70%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*

QMAR

1D
0.21%
1M
1.71%
YTD
2.66%
6M
5.02%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VNSE vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNSE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VNSE vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNSE
VNSE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VNSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VNSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNSE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAR
QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNSE vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF (VNSE) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNSEQMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.40

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

2.23

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.09

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.46

14.47

-10.01

VNSE vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNSE and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNSEQMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.40

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.78

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between VNSE and QMAR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VNSE vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

VNSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
VNSE
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
0.22%0.21%0.00%0.21%7.01%19.65%0.06%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VNSE vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNSE drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNSE and QMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VNSEQMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.21%

-19.83%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-6.01%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-19.83%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-0.12%

-8.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-3.39%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.33%

+1.91%

Volatility

VNSE vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF (VNSE) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 3.52%. This indicates that VNSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VNSEQMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

3.52%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

4.64%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

13.26%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

14.04%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

14.02%

+3.22%