VNSE vs. BUFH
VNSE (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNSE charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
VNSE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNSE achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.49% return.
VNSE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VNSE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VNSE Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF | 9.06% | 9.69% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.49% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNSE and BUFH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNSE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
VNSE
BUFH
VNSE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF (VNSE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNSE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNSE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 2.94 | -2.09 |
Drawdowns
VNSE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNSE drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNSE and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNSE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.21% | -1.53% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -0.18% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | — | — |
Volatility
VNSE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNSE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 2.37% | +11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 2.37% | +14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 2.37% | +14.78% |
VNSE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNSE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNSE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
VNSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNSE Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 7.01% | 19.65% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNSE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNSE is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNSE is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
VNSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
VNSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for VNSE and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for VNSE and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer