PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNRT.L is traded in GBP, while FUSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than FUSA.L's 8.45% return.


VNRT.L

1D
0.13%
1M
5.67%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.64%

FUSA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.49%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.10%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
10.09%8.77%26.36%19.99%-9.98%28.99%15.42%26.39%-6.23%
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
8.45%8.02%20.04%12.14%0.13%27.42%8.73%26.82%-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRT.L and FUSA.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2018

0.82

The correlation between VNRT.L and FUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRT.L
FUSA.L

Technology

34.4%
35.0%

Financial Services

13.0%
12.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.2%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.1%

Technology

VNRT.L
34.4%
FUSA.L
35.0%

Financial Services

VNRT.L
13.0%
FUSA.L
12.6%

Communication Services

VNRT.L
10.9%
FUSA.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRT.L
9.8%
FUSA.L
9.3%

Industrials

VNRT.L
8.3%
FUSA.L
8.8%

Healthcare

VNRT.L
8.2%
FUSA.L
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VNRT.L
4.7%
FUSA.L
4.5%

Energy

VNRT.L
4.3%
FUSA.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

VNRT.L
2.4%
FUSA.L
2.2%

Utilities

VNRT.L
2.3%
FUSA.L
2.3%

Real Estate

VNRT.L
1.8%
FUSA.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRT.L
VNRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNRT.LFUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.44

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

16.80

-4.24

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRT.L and FUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNRT.LFUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.26

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.90

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.84

+0.13

Drawdowns

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum FUSA.L drawdown of -27.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and FUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRT.LFUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-27.94%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-5.58%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-19.20%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-19.20%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-3.35%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.48%

+0.70%

Volatility

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) is 2.57%, while Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that VNRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRT.LFUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

3.32%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.90%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

10.99%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

14.33%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

16.94%

-1.39%

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRT.L vs. FUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VNRT.L nor FUSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.24%1.41%1.02%1.43%1.48%1.76%1.61%1.51%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNRT.L and FUSA.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSA.L.

VNRT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FUSA.L is Dividend. VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.25% for FUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and FUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer