VNRG.L vs. VONE
VNRG.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Vanguard - VNRG.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while VONE tracks the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNRG.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for VONE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNRG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.
Performance
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VNRG.L is traded in GBP, while VONE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VONE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNRG.L achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 9.35% return.
VNRG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VONE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.93%
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.37% | 10.01% | 26.94% | 19.89% | -9.87% | 28.98% | 15.46% | 1.78% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 9.35% | 8.86% | 26.69% | 20.09% | -9.52% | 27.69% | 17.39% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRG.L and VONE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between VNRG.L and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNRG.L
VONE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VNRG.L
VONE
Financial Services
VNRG.L
VONE
Communication Services
VNRG.L
VONE
Consumer Cyclical
VNRG.L
VONE
Industrials
VNRG.L
VONE
Healthcare
VNRG.L
VONE
Consumer Defensive
VNRG.L
VONE
Energy
VNRG.L
VONE
Basic Materials
VNRG.L
VONE
Utilities
VNRG.L
VONE
Real Estate
VNRG.L
VONE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRG.L vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank
VNRG.L
VONE
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNRG.L | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.44 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.74 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 14.21 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNRG.L | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.33 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.88 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.91 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VONE drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRG.L and VONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRG.L | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -26.87% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -7.32% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.92% | -22.19% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -22.19% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.89% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -3.43% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) is 2.56%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that VNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRG.L | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 3.21% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 8.43% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 11.74% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 15.99% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 18.29% | -2.03% |
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRG.L vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison
VNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNRG.L and VONE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRG.L.
VNRG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRG.L and 0.08% for VONE.
Find the right allocation for VNRG.L and VONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer