VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L
VNRG.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VNRG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNRG.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNRG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNRG.L achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 53.85% return.
VNRG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 11.06%
- YTD
- 53.85%
- 6M
- 57.92%
- 1Y
- 89.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.37% | 10.01% | 26.94% | 19.89% | -9.87% | 28.98% | 15.46% | 1.85% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 53.85% | 30.58% | -3.05% | 4.09% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRG.L and VDPG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between VNRG.L and VDPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Financial Services
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Communication Services
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Industrials
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Healthcare
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Defensive
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Energy
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Basic Materials
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Utilities
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Real Estate
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNRG.L
VDPG.L
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNRG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.81 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 6.87 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 25.62 | -10.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNRG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 4.56 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.86 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.75 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRG.L and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -30.11% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -13.45% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.92% | -16.71% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -17.64% | -3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.73% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -5.88% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.61% | -1.66% |
Volatility
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) is 2.56%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that VNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 10.34% | -7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 17.86% | -10.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 20.26% | -9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 15.89% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 18.41% | -2.15% |
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRG.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VNRG.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VNRG.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNRG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VDPG.L.
VNRG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VNRG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRG.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for VNRG.L and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer