VNQI vs. VB
VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQI returned 2.74%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
VNQI vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 2.74%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
VNQI
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
VNQI vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | -0.33% | 21.38% | -2.22% | 6.99% | -22.94% | 5.93% | -7.22% | 21.59% | -9.44% | 26.91% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQI and VB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VNQI and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNQI vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQI
VB
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
VNQI
VB
Financial Services
VNQI
VB
Consumer Cyclical
VNQI
VB
Industrials
VNQI
VB
Energy
VNQI
VB
Basic Materials
VNQI
VB
Technology
VNQI
VB
Utilities
VNQI
VB
Consumer Defensive
VNQI
VB
Healthcare
VNQI
VB
Communication Services
VNQI
-
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQI vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VNQI
VB
VNQI vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQI | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 3.21 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 11.80 | -10.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQI vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQI | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -59.56% | +21.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -8.98% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -25.36% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.55% | -28.15% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -42.05% | +3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | 0.00% | -9.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -8.43% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.19% | 2.44% | +2.75% |
Volatility
VNQI vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) is 4.62%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that VNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQI | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.41% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 12.24% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 16.68% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 20.80% | -5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 21.44% | -5.37% |
VNQI vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQI vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 5.16% | 3.74% | 0.57% | 6.48% | 0.93% | 7.58% | 4.62% | 3.86% | 5.18% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQI and VB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.61% vs 2.74% for VNQI. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VNQI.
VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
VNQI is categorized as REIT, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.05% for VB.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQI and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer