PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQI vs. IFGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQI vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VNQI having a -1.07% return and IFGL slightly higher at -1.03%. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has outperformed IFGL with an annualized return of 2.39%, while IFGL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.


VNQI

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
0.24%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
2.39%

IFGL

1D
-0.24%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
0.90%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
1.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-1.07%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%
IFGL
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
-1.03%24.31%-7.25%5.40%-24.21%8.29%-7.62%20.65%-6.39%20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and IFGL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VNQI and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQI vs. IFGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNQI
IFGL

Real Estate

91.2%
98.9%

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
0.1%

Industrials

0.7%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Technology

0.2%
1.1%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Real Estate

VNQI
91.2%
IFGL
98.9%

Financial Services

VNQI
1.9%
IFGL

-

Consumer Cyclical

VNQI
1.1%
IFGL
0.1%

Industrials

VNQI
0.7%
IFGL

-

Energy

VNQI
0.3%
IFGL

-

Basic Materials

VNQI
0.3%
IFGL

-

Technology

VNQI
0.2%
IFGL
1.1%

Utilities

VNQI
0.1%
IFGL

-

Consumer Defensive

VNQI
0.1%
IFGL

-

Healthcare

VNQI
0.0%
IFGL

-

Communication Services

VNQI

-

IFGL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQI vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IFGL
IFGL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IFGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IFGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFGL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNQIIFGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

0.79

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.10

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.60

1.65

-0.05

VNQI vs. IFGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the IFGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and IFGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNQIIFGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

-0.14

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.09

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.04

+0.16

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum IFGL drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and IFGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQIIFGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-67.94%

+29.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-14.38%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-18.77%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-38.47%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

-40.38%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.66%

-13.93%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-16.68%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

4.59%

+0.14%

Volatility

VNQI vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQIIFGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

11.42%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

13.66%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

16.38%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.59%

-0.53%

VNQI vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNQI vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than IFGL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFGL
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
3.85%3.71%4.83%1.82%2.79%3.25%2.17%7.60%4.10%4.90%7.68%3.70%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.75%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VNQI and IFGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VNQI has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to IFGL (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs IFGL's -67.94%.

On 10-year performance, VNQI leads with 2.39% vs 1.53% for IFGL. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VNQI has performed better with a 2.39% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 3.85% for IFGL.

VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.48% for IFGL.

IFGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQI and IFGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer