VNQ vs. SPMO
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.53%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.
Performance
VNQ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 5.53%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
SPMO
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- 24.30%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 41.24%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
VNQ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 26.56% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and SPMO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and SPMO has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VNQ vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
SPMO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
SPMO
Basic Materials
VNQ
SPMO
Communication Services
VNQ
SPMO
Technology
VNQ
SPMO
Energy
VNQ
SPMO
Financial Services
VNQ
SPMO
Industrials
VNQ
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
SPMO
Healthcare
VNQ
-
SPMO
Utilities
VNQ
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
SPMO
VNQ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 3.31 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 12.52 | -7.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -30.95% | -42.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -12.70% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -20.13% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -22.74% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -30.95% | -11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.91% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -4.60% | -9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.35% | -0.70% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 10.29% | -5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 16.70% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 19.45% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 19.65% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 20.48% | +0.24% |
VNQ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VNQ and SPMO have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and SPMO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.59% vs 5.53% for VNQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ and SPMO have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while SPMO is Momentum. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer