VNQ vs. MLPA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for MLPA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MLPA.

Performance

VNQ vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 5.65%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.37% annualized return.

VNQ

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 12.51%
• 6M: 12.32%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: 2.55%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

MLPA

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 13.46%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	12.51%	3.24%	4.81%	11.85%	-26.25%	40.54%	-4.61%	28.91%	-6.03%	4.90%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	14.72%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	39.64%	-33.97%	11.91%	-15.71%	-8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and MLPA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012	0.33

The correlation between VNQ and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNQ vs. MLPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNQ	MLPA
Real Estate	97.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Communication Services	0.6%	-
Technology	0.3%	-
Energy	0.1%	96.9%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

VNQ vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ

VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 32
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 35
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNQ	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.13	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.65	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.62	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.90	4.85	+0.05

VNQ vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and MLPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNQ	MLPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.07%	-78.75%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-8.33%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	-14.20%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.48%	-18.75%	-15.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.40%	-74.05%	+31.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.96%	+4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	-20.24%	+6.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.80%	-0.15%

Volatility

VNQ vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 4.39%. This indicates that VNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNQ	MLPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	4.39%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.77%	8.56%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	11.93%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	18.19%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	27.45%	-6.73%

VNQ vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNQ vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than MLPA's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.36%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	3.54%	3.92%	3.85%	3.95%	3.91%	2.56%	3.93%	3.39%	4.74%	4.23%	4.82%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNQ and MLPA in my portfolio?

VNQ and MLPA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNQ or MLPA?

VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MLPA (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

Which ETF is better, VNQ or MLPA?

On 10-year performance, MLPA leads with 6.37% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MLPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNQ or MLPA?

Over the 10-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNQ or MLPA?

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNQ or MLPA?

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.54% for VNQ.

What is the main difference between VNQ and MLPA?

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while MLPA is MLPs. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.46% for MLPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.