VNQ vs. IWP
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for IWP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.
Performance
VNQ vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 5.65%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
IWP
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
VNQ vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 2.86% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and IWP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and IWP has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
IWP
VNQ vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.31 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 0.89 | +4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than IWP's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and IWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -56.92% | -16.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -14.79% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -25.20% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -38.62% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -38.62% | -3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.95% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -9.68% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 5.10% | -2.45% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.72%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.68% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 13.34% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 17.03% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 22.37% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 21.71% | -0.99% |
VNQ vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQ vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and IWP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to VNQ (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs IWP's -56.92%.
On 10-year performance, IWP leads with 12.47% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWP has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.23% for IWP.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and IWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer