PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VNQ vs. IWFM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VNQ vs. IWFM.L

Last updated Jun 11, 2026

VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and IWFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWFM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.54%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for IWFM.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWFM.L.

Performance

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VNQ is traded in USD, while IWFM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than IWFM.L's 15.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed IWFM.L with an annualized return of 5.54%, while IWFM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.

VNQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.02%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.72%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
5.54%

IWFM.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
15.86%
6M
15.33%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
15.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF		11.56%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)		15.86%21.23%30.41%11.44%-18.02%14.53%27.96%28.19%-4.13%31.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and IWFM.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.30

The correlation between VNQ and IWFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VNQ
IWFM.L

Real Estate

97.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

0.6%
6.8%

Technology

0.3%
26.0%

Energy

0.1%
10.6%

Financial Services

0.1%
13.1%

Industrials

0.0%
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

10.7%

Utilities

-

3.7%

Real Estate

VNQ
97.3%
IWFM.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

VNQ
1.1%
IWFM.L
6.0%

Communication Services

VNQ
0.6%
IWFM.L
6.8%

Technology

VNQ
0.3%
IWFM.L
26.0%

Energy

VNQ
0.1%
IWFM.L
10.6%

Financial Services

VNQ
0.1%
IWFM.L
13.1%

Industrials

VNQ
0.0%
IWFM.L
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VNQ

-

IWFM.L
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

VNQ

-

IWFM.L
1.5%

Healthcare

VNQ

-

IWFM.L
10.7%

Utilities

VNQ

-

IWFM.L
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Real Estate ETF

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with VNQ:
VNQ vs. SCHHVNQ vs. VOOVNQ vs. SPYVNQ vs. XLREVNQ vs. VNQIVNQ vs. SCHDVNQ vs. REET
Often compared with IWFM.L:
IWFM.L vs. SPMOIWFM.L vs. XDEM.DEIWFM.L vs. IMTMIWFM.L vs. IUMF.LIWFM.L vs. JPGL.LIWFM.L vs. SPYIWFM.L vs. ACWI

Return for Risk

VNQ vs. IWFM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
IWFM.L
IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VNQIWFM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.88
1.62

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.29
2.46

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.50

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

10.43

-5.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and IWFM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VNQIWFM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.62

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.54

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.74

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than IWFM.L's maximum drawdown of -42.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and IWFM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VNQIWFM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-42.09%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-11.70%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-19.82%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-30.66%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

-30.82%

-11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-5.67%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-13.36%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.80%

-0.15%

Volatility

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VNQIWFM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.68%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

15.72%

-5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

18.08%

-4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

22.93%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

20.27%

+0.45%

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VNQ vs. IWFM.L - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while IWFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF		3.57%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

VNQ and IWFM.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWFM.L.

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while IWFM.L is Momentum. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWFM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.25% for IWFM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQ and IWFM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer