IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE).
IWFM.L and XDEM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. XDEM.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. Both IWFM.L and XDEM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWFM.L or XDEM.DE.
Key characteristics
| IWFM.L | XDEM.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 31.64% | 37.64% |
| 1Y Return | 36.04% | 42.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.56% | 8.45% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.24% | 13.83% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 15.52% | 16.64% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.25 | 2.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.95 | 3.25 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.81 | 2.99 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.54 | 12.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.41% | 3.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.90% | 16.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.58% | -30.93% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFM.L and XDEM.DE is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWFM.L achieves a 31.64% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 37.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFM.L has underperformed XDEM.DE with an annualized return of 15.52%, while XDEM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.64% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFM.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWFM.L nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFM.L iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.DE drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and XDEM.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.